| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 02/08/15 19:13, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 08:30:41PM -0700, Lee wrote: |
| 6 |
>> Not an answer to your question, but Google - chrome is a much |
| 7 |
>> better browser imo, and installs itself very quickly and tidily |
| 8 |
>> with portage. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If you are interested in software that tells its maker where you go |
| 11 |
> and what you say all the time ... *SCNR* |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Precisely the reason [1] I stopped using Chrome (plus chromium takes |
| 14 |
so long to build and the theming is painful). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
The so-called "black box" was supposedly removed from Chrom{e,ium}, |
| 17 |
but if Google were willing to do it once, they've lost my vote WRT |
| 18 |
privacy advocacy and openness. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
[1]: |
| 21 |
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jun/23/google-eavesdropping-t |
| 22 |
ool-installed-computers-without-permission |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
[2]: |
| 25 |
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jun/25/google-pulls-listening |
| 26 |
- -software-chromium |
| 27 |
- -- |
| 28 |
wraeth <wraeth@×××××××××.au> |
| 29 |
GnuPG Key: B2D9F759 |
| 30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlW94PoACgkQXcRKerLZ91kQlQD8D/sc80xpbnU4gVXXLl/S1AMO |
| 34 |
NPZQS+2wz09mNc9dMY0A/RlxHiherhG56m7sTcACQXS9nF0hvhmwejJznmm08rjV |
| 35 |
=C1OP |
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives