| 1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 03:59:25 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> Though I would prefix the atom with ~ instead of = to cover patch |
| 5 |
>>> level updates. |
| 6 |
>> I have looked for a place where it is documented how to do that. I know |
| 7 |
>> there is a lot of ways to add packages to those files with <=> and such |
| 8 |
>> in front of the package names. Do you have a link to some docs on |
| 9 |
>> that? If not, some examples would be cool. |
| 10 |
> man portage |
| 11 |
> man 5 ebuild |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The latter has more detail. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Gold mine. I knew it had to be somewhere but never could find it. |
| 16 |
Thank you!! |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
>> Well, I was going to try adding the variable to make.conf as posted in |
| 21 |
>> another email. I think that may be better since this seems to be a |
| 22 |
>> issue that is "in flux" at the moment. ;-) |
| 23 |
> I think the very fluxiness of it would put me off enabling it globally |
| 24 |
> and set it case by case until things had settled down. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> BTW eix-test-obsolete is a good tool for cleaning up /etc/portage, |
| 27 |
> finding all sorts of per-package settings you set and forgot about. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Yea, may try that. I dunno. To sleepy right now. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
I tend to forget to run that until the list gets HUGE then it is like, |
| 35 |
that takes to long so oh well. I really need to spend a few hours |
| 36 |
working on that tho. I'm sure it is a nightmare by now. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Dale |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
:-) :-) |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives