1 |
On Saturday 13 June 2009 01:54:45 Francisco Ares wrote: |
2 |
> Thanks a lot! |
3 |
|
4 |
It's not completely obvious from Dirk's post (what he said is completely |
5 |
accurate though), but kde-3.5.10 will not receive monolithic ebuilds (dev |
6 |
decision). If you want kde-3.5.10, there is only one way to do it - |
7 |
|
8 |
Unmerge your existing kde monolithic packages |
9 |
Rememerge the new kde split packages |
10 |
|
11 |
There's a good migration guide at gentoo.org, called "Migrating to KDE split |
12 |
ebuilds" or some such. A quick search will find it for you. |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
> |
18 |
> Francisco |
19 |
> |
20 |
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Dirk Heinrichs |
21 |
<dirk.heinrichs@××××××.de>wrote: |
22 |
> > Am Freitag 12 Juni 2009 22:45:49 schrieb Francisco Ares: |
23 |
> > > And how do I tell if an ebuild is monolithic or not? |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > The monolithic ones install larger parts of KDE, and usually have the |
26 |
> > same names as the original source packages offered at KDE.org. |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > The split ebuilds, well, split those packages into their individual |
29 |
> > applications, so you have ebuilds for konqueror (which is also part of |
30 |
> > kdenetwork) or kmail (kdepim). In addition, there are the "-meta" |
31 |
> > ebuilds, which have the same name as the monolitic ones, but with -meta |
32 |
> > appended (kdepim-meta). Those usually install the same applications than |
33 |
> > monolithic ebuilds, but as split ebuilds. |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > So, when you install kde, you get a complete KDE from monolithic ebuilds |
36 |
> > and |
37 |
> > when you install kde-meta, you get a complete KDE from split ebuilds. |
38 |
> > |
39 |
> > That's also the reason why they block each other. When you have kdepim |
40 |
> > installed, you already got kmail, so you shouldn't install kmail from the |
41 |
> > split ebuild again. |
42 |
> > |
43 |
> > HTH... |
44 |
> > |
45 |
> > Dirk |
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |