1 |
On 09/17/2016 12:08 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On 17/09/2016 17:16, Robin Atwood wrote: |
3 |
>> On Saturday 17 September 2016, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>> What a peculiar odd thing to say. You might want to revisit your word |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>> choice there. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Perhaps you're right. Unfortunately I don't have the time currently to |
12 |
>> fight with ebuilds so I will declare my system, in IBM's immortal |
13 |
>> expression, "functionally stabilised"! It does everything I need it to |
14 |
>> so updates are not really necessary. I looked into the KDE5 upgrade |
15 |
>> recently and what I read did not inspire me with confidence. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> KDE5 works well enough, I've been using it here for months. There are |
19 |
> recurring reports of icons going missing and other uber-annoying |
20 |
> cosmetic issues, but I find the software quite functional. |
21 |
|
22 |
I like to actually *use* my computer though, not fight the DE. When I |
23 |
tried it months ago, plasma would crash every 10 seconds on its own. |
24 |
|
25 |
KDE5 won't be stable until another year at the minimum. After installing |
26 |
it and having the crashing (and other issues, but the main one was the |
27 |
constant crashing) I had no desire to put up with a broken DE for years |
28 |
like my experience with KDE4. Hell, with KDE4 it took them two years to |
29 |
put back basic functionality like a fully-functional systemsettings. |
30 |
|
31 |
> |
32 |
> One thing KDE5 isn't though, is KDE4++ :-) |
33 |
> |
34 |
> If KDE4 is really what you want, then you best stick with it. |
35 |
> |
36 |
|
37 |
It sure isn't easy though. I've stopped updating my computer and I |
38 |
probably won't try KDE5 until middle next year. Hopefully by then it'll |
39 |
actually be *usable*. It would have been nice if they snapshotted kde4 |
40 |
7-8 months ago and put the entirety in kde-sunset before messing with |
41 |
ebuilds and creating cross-version dependencies. |
42 |
|
43 |
Dan |