1 |
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On 28/09/13 01:33, Dale wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> Bruce Hill wrote: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> mingdao@workstation ~ $ eselect news read |
7 |
>>> 2013-09-27-initramfs-required |
8 |
>>> Title Separate /usr on Linux requires initramfs |
9 |
>>> Author William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
10 |
>>> Posted 2013-09-27 |
11 |
>>> Revision 1 |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> Linux systems which have / and /usr on separate file systems but do not |
14 |
>>> use an initramfs will not be supported starting on 01-Nov-2013. |
15 |
>>> [...] |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> I'm hoping that since I use eudev, I don't have to worry about this. If |
20 |
>> I do, this could get interesting, again. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> You do need to worry about this. Actually, you always had to worry about |
24 |
> this. It's just that your specific configuration didn't blow up in a |
25 |
> visible way. You might had problems already in the past, just not apparent |
26 |
> ones. If you read the links posted in the announcement, you will see that |
27 |
> the problem wasn't eudev or udev. It's all the other software on your |
28 |
> system. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> eudev *cannot* fix that. |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
As far as I read, the problem is with bluetooth keyboards? and some |
34 |
other devices and locales, which are minor for this decision of |
35 |
removing supportability. Especially for servers and for most of |
36 |
workstations. Most sane configuration can be supported with separate |
37 |
/. |
38 |
|
39 |
And of course there is the hidden systemd agenda, which is what I |
40 |
suspect had more impact. |
41 |
|
42 |
Regards, |
43 |
Alon Bar-Lev. |