1 |
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> covici@××××××××××.com wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> Mick<michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> On Saturday 26 Nov 2011 15:22:15 Michael Mol wrote: |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> I just wanted to share an experience I had today with optimizing |
9 |
>>>> parallel |
10 |
>>>> builds after discovering "-l" for Make... |
11 |
>>>> |
12 |
>>>> I've got a little more tweaking I still want to do, but this is pretty |
13 |
>>>> awesome... |
14 |
>>>> |
15 |
>>>> http://funnybutnot.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/optimizing-parallel-builds/ |
16 |
>>>> |
17 |
>>>> ZZ |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>>> Thanks for sharing! How do you determine the optimum value for -l? |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> How do you get emerge not to display number of jobs and load average -- |
22 |
>> I only want to compile one at a time -- much safer that way and it is |
23 |
>> doing that, but now it displays all that load average and how many jobs, |
24 |
>> etc. -- any way to get rid of that display? |
25 |
>> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Thank Zac for that. He thinks he knows what you want. ;-) Apparently not |
28 |
> huh? |
29 |
> |
30 |
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-901858.html |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Just add --quiet-build=n to EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS in make.conf and it will do |
33 |
> it the old way. |
34 |
|
35 |
Oh! I hadn't realized there was an update to portage that changed |
36 |
that. Missed it on my main box, I suppose. |
37 |
-- |
38 |
:wq |