| 1 |
On 01/08/2015 09:37 PM, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jc García wrote: |
| 3 |
>> 2015-01-08 11:02 GMT-06:00 behrouz khosravi <bz.khosravi@×××××.com>: |
| 4 |
>>> Hi. I was wondering that is it predictable that when qt5 and plasma 5 will |
| 5 |
>>> be unmasked? |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>> Keep an eye on the bug-tracker for the unmasking of qt5[1] or hang |
| 8 |
>> around the #gentoo-qt irc channel[2] , there you can get first hand |
| 9 |
>> information, |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> It's work that needs to be done, and usually developers work on their |
| 12 |
>> free time and bugs might keep arising, so prediction doesn't work. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454132 |
| 15 |
>> [2] irc://irc.gentoo.org/gentoo-qt |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> On this topic, has anyone used qt5 and plasma 5 yet? Is it at least |
| 20 |
> workable? I ask because I may give it a try unless people think it is |
| 21 |
> to early yet. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Thanks. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Dale |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> :-) :-) |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I've been using it on my machine for a few months now actually. In the |
| 32 |
beginning there were tons of ups and downs as it got stabilized, but |
| 33 |
it's been pretty smooth lately. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
There are definitely some kinks that still need to be worked out, and |
| 36 |
there are only a couple k-applications that have been updated to work |
| 37 |
with the new frameworks (unless you're willing to go with the live ebuilds). |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
I'd wait till plasma 5.2 is released, or at least in beta. I've heard |
| 40 |
that a lot of bugs will be ironed out then. Though if you're curious, |
| 41 |
it's completely usable right now, nothing is currently on fire on my |
| 42 |
computer! |
Archives