| 1 |
On 03/03/2018 12:00 PM, Grant Taylor wrote: |
| 2 |
> * I do not consider messages from me re-sent by mailing lists to be |
| 3 |
> messages that I send. I say this because my email infrastructure does |
| 4 |
> NOT connect to any of the mailing list subscribers receiving email |
| 5 |
> infrastructure. IMHO the mailing list is sending a /new/ message to |
| 6 |
> those recipients. Said message just happens to be strongly based on a |
| 7 |
> message that I sent. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Further to this point… |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
When Dale (et al) requested that messages (which were reported in their |
| 12 |
bounce notifications) be re-sent to them, those messages did NOT |
| 13 |
originate from my email infrastructure in any capacity. They are |
| 14 |
complete (re)generations by the mailing list manager. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Grant. . . . |
| 20 |
unix || die |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
P.S. If you can't tell, I have very strong opinions on things. I've |
| 24 |
recently been stating that ARP is a layer 3 protocol, just like IP. |
| 25 |
(They both have their own EtherType and ride on top of the L2 Ethernet |
| 26 |
Protocol.) The only difference is that ARP is unrouted where as IP is |
| 27 |
routed. |
Archives