| 1 |
Wonderful, thanks! I’m going with screen, just because the first link is a shorter read.
|
| 2 |
raffaele
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
From: Michele Alzetta <michele.alzetta@×××××.com>
|
| 5 |
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 09:52
|
| 6 |
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
|
| 7 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] update remote system in background
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
... or tmux ...
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
https://github.com/tmux/tmux/wiki
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Il giorno ven 24 apr 2020 alle ore 09:50 Vladimir Romanov <blueboar2@×××××.com<mailto:blueboar2@×××××.com>> ha scritto:
|
| 14 |
Yes, you can use "screen" program (Docs:
|
| 15 |
https://net2.com/how-to-use-the-screen-command-on-linux-to-keep-your-remote-task-running-when-the-connection-drops/)
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
пт, 24 апр. 2020 г. в 12:47, Raffaele BELARDI <raffaele.belardi@××.com<mailto:raffaele.belardi@××.com>>:
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Hello, |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I am able to ssh into a remote system that I would like to update. I’d like to run emerge without keeping the local system connected for the whole duration of the update (probably several days). Is it possible to: |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> - ssh remote_machine |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> - emerge -uDvN world |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> - background and detach in some way the emerge process |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> - logout from ssh |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> - several days later, ssh into the remote_machine, reattach the emerge and check the output or continue the emerge |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> Thanks, |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> raffaele |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
> PS I’ll do it _after_ openssh update. |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
> |
Archives