1 |
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 00:27:28 +0100 |
2 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 19:15:22 -0400, Dutch Ingraham wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > I suppose its now time for an uninstall. Kind of disappointing; we |
7 |
> > are told Gentoo is about choices, and in fact that's true. I made |
8 |
> > the choice to use a pure openRC system. The last 7 hours of free |
9 |
> > time, though, was spent trying, and ultimately failing, to correct |
10 |
> > a problem not chosen, not wanted, and not invited. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> ...and not of Gentoo's doing. You are trying to blame Gentoo for a |
13 |
> problem arising from an overlay. A more productive use of your time |
14 |
> would be to inform the overlay's maintainers about your problem and |
15 |
> request a fix, which may well be a simple ebuild tweak. |
16 |
|
17 |
It has been fixed two days ago; so, Ingraham needs to sync the overlay: |
18 |
|
19 |
https://github.com/Sabayon/mate-overlay/commit/0e4acf73e81083d87d43e2a0b0be2b959f1e6a78 |
20 |
|
21 |
A news item was put out that it was being migrated to the Portage tree: |
22 |
|
23 |
https://github.com/Sabayon/mate-overlay/blob/master/metadata/news/2014-02-21-portage-import/2014-02-21-portage-import.en.txt |
24 |
|
25 |
And they are now planning to retire the overlay to make people switch: |
26 |
|
27 |
https://github.com/Sabayon/mate-overlay/issues/76 |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
With kind regards, |
31 |
|
32 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
33 |
Gentoo Developer |
34 |
|
35 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
36 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
37 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |