1 |
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 17:31 -0700, walt wrote: |
2 |
> On 05/11/2010 12:53 AM, Bill Kenworthy wrote: |
3 |
> > ... |
4 |
> > I am at a point with evolution where I want 2.28 or 2.30 |
5 |
> > for exchange access so do I upgrade gnome to ~x86 (and work out any |
6 |
> > kinks that will involve), do evolution only or wait?... |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I can predict that unmasking evolution alone is way too messy and |
9 |
> painful to risk trying. I'm just guessing about unmasking ~gnome on |
10 |
> an x86 machine, but my gut feeling is that it may be less messy, but |
11 |
> still not completely free of headaches (more informed opinions are |
12 |
> requested, of course). |
13 |
> |
14 |
> My only semi-helpful idea for dilemmas like yours is to learn to use |
15 |
> VirtualBox so you can run an unstable version of gentoo on your stable |
16 |
> gentoo machine without risking any possible(probable) disasters. It's |
17 |
> a great product and well worth your time to learn to use it, IMO. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
I already use vbox (there are currently 3 Fedora instances running in |
23 |
vbox vm's on the gentoo box I am using to type this att and then there |
24 |
is vmware on my laptop for work uses and qemu at home - for Fedora and |
25 |
windows on gentoo :), however, running another operating system just to |
26 |
read exchange email/calendaring (work nonsense!) - might just as well |
27 |
give up and run windows and outlook in a vm. I am currently using |
28 |
davmail to interface evo 2.26.3 to exchange and it works reasonably |
29 |
well, but again I am hoping to use the advances in later evo versions to |
30 |
go direct and not via a connector. |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
BillK |