| 1 |
On Sat 25 Feb 2012 09:35:22 AM IST, Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Feb 25, 2012 10:34 AM, "Nilesh Govindrajan" <contact@××××××××.com |
| 4 |
> <mailto:contact@××××××××.com>> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Hi, |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > I'm using XFS on /home and facing a strange issue. When I add acl to |
| 9 |
> > the mount options in /etc/fstab, the FS fails to mount during boot |
| 10 |
> > with an error in dmesg which says invalid option acl whereas I'm able |
| 11 |
> > to mount it using the mount command from the CLI. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > For now I'm using a script in local.d to remount it with acl, but why |
| 14 |
> > is this happening? |
| 15 |
> > Also, XFS is compiled right into the kernel, not as a module (I |
| 16 |
> > believe, because there's no module xfs in /lib/modules/3.2.6-gentoo. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> AFAIK, by default XFS is mounted with acl support. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Plus, I can't find any "acl" word in the documentation: |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/filesystems/xfs.txt;hb=HEAD |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> CMIIW, I never use XFS before in my life. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Rgds, |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Well, I use XFS for performance. Earlier I was using ext4 and troubled |
| 31 |
with sluggishness. Recently I came to know that ext4 has a mount option |
| 32 |
data=writeback which improves performance manifolds (using that on |
| 33 |
servers and it does do well than with the default ordered mode). |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Nilesh Govindarajan |
| 37 |
http://nileshgr.com |
Archives