| 1 |
> On 27/03/13 at 11:27am, »Q« wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Eventually, as I understand it, GNOME and KDE will require systemd |
| 3 |
> > because they want full control of they system. For people not using |
| 4 |
> > GNOME or KDE, other init systems will still be possible, with either |
| 5 |
> > udev or a udev alternative. I have no idea how far away "eventually" |
| 6 |
> > will be. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> GNOME maybe/probably, but regarding KDE what makes you say this ? |
| 9 |
> I don't recall reading anything about this (this one comes to mind but |
| 10 |
> its got nothing to do with systemd [1]. The author explains in the |
| 11 |
> comments why he chose not to use systemd). KDE always prides itself in |
| 12 |
> being cross platform forcing systemd would be terribly detrimental. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> [1] http://dantti.wordpress.com/2013/02/27/1-2-3-plasma/ |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Actually it came up not too long ago that a commit was making Gnome |
| 17 |
Linux only and I believe it was decided not to be the way to Go. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
_______________________________________________________________________ |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work |
| 23 |
together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a |
| 24 |
universal interface' |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
(Doug McIlroy) |
| 27 |
_______________________________________________________________________ |
Archives