| 1 |
Stroller <stroller <at> stellar.eclipse.co.uk> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 29 Mar 2008, at 20:39, Michael Schmarck wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Stroller <stroller <at> stellar.eclipse.co.uk> writes: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> >> I, too, thought about saying something like this at the time. I'm |
| 7 |
> >> glad you have done so and I agree with all your points. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > I don't. I disagree with his most important point... |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Yes, but you're demonstrating yourself to be a clueless idiot. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
And why's that? As shown, the problems were due to the way the |
| 14 |
rhythmbox (or totem) package was built. I'm now an idiot because |
| 15 |
I've been biten by such a bug? And in how far am I clueless? Just |
| 16 |
because you see things differently then I do? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> >> Alan's reply was harmless. You're not entitled to pick on him unless |
| 19 |
> >> you posted correctly in the first place. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > So, I *am* entitled. Thanks! |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> No, you're not. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
But you said, that I am. Could you please stop changing your mind? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> >> You're asking for help - provide as much information as possible and |
| 28 |
> >> please don't antagonise people (especially because they may be able |
| 29 |
> >> to help you!). |
| 30 |
> > |
| 31 |
> > Now, please go back and read Alans first post in the thread. It |
| 32 |
> > absolutely did not sound, as if he even wanted to help. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> That doesn't matter. Please don't antagonise people, full-stop. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Yes, it absouletly does matter. It makes all of a difference. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
> >> I, too, know what it's like to receive a reply to one of my questions |
| 39 |
> >> which I find to be unhelpful and aggravating. However, "two wrongs |
| 40 |
> >> don't make a right" and no-one benefits from an angry response. |
| 41 |
> > |
| 42 |
> > Oh, so it's now my fault for responding to a flamebait? Nice. It's |
| 43 |
> > not the aggressor who's doing something wrong? |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> It was NOT flamebait. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
It was. Even if it maybe was not the intention. And you can see that |
| 48 |
it was, if you have a look at the subthread. |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
> It was HARMLESS. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
Yes. |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
In your world, an aggressor is doing nothing wrong? Do I understand |
| 55 |
that right? |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
Well, that's something were we seem to disagree. |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
> Grown up! |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
Get real. |
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
Michael |
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
-- |
| 66 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives