Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:32:45
Message-Id: 200602210524.44868.bss03@volumehost.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync by Ow Mun Heng
1 On Tuesday 21 February 2006 04:07, Ow Mun Heng <Ow.Mun.Heng@×××.com> wrote
2 about '[gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync':
3 > Anyone wants to comment??
4
5 I already think Gentoo base system requirements are a bit heavy just having
6 python in there. (I'm trying to run gentoo on my WRT54G 1.1; storage over
7 nfs/nbd) It would be completely over-the-top to require Modula 3 support
8 as well.
9
10 That said, it would be nice to do away with the "building file list..."
11 delay we have with rsync.
12
13 --
14 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
15 bss03@××××××××××.com
16 ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy
17
18 -- Portage needs to be written in C. --
19 --
20 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync Aniruddha Shankar <karim@×××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync Ow Mun Heng <Ow.Mun.Heng@×××.com>