1 |
Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu <at> unlimitedmail.org> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> The GPL does allow to sell your product (as opposite to giving it away |
5 |
> for free). Why should Montavista be sued if they respect the GPL? As |
6 |
> long as they distribute the source code with their products (which |
7 |
> admittedly I don't know), they are fine. Just because the sources are |
8 |
> not downloadable from their site, does not mean that they should be |
9 |
> sued. |
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
Ummm, I guess you are new to a space that I have worked in for a very |
13 |
long time. Let's make this simple. Why don't you just pose as |
14 |
a company that need MV's EL (embedded linux) and ask for a listing of |
15 |
all of the wonderful thing you can do with MV EL that are superior |
16 |
to the public offerings of EL. Then ask them from their sourcecode |
17 |
to these 'enhancements'. They are not alone, they are just |
18 |
one of the companies selling a RTOS based on EL..... |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
> It seems to me that the difference is not between small or big companies, |
24 |
> but rather between those who obey the GPL and those who do not. |
25 |
|
26 |
Naive, you are! Big companies have lawyer, lobyist and often politicians |
27 |
in their pocket. Over the years most people, at least in countries that |
28 |
pretend to have democracy, have seen this. Remember how the Democratic |
29 |
politicians and state where going after MS and then most of the issues |
30 |
got settled by republican. Yet the EU still slapped MS with lawsuits |
31 |
and punitive damages? If you think small companies are treated just |
32 |
like big one, you are very naive and no amount of evidence will change |
33 |
your mind..... Just ask most anyone that's been in small business before. |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
> Recently, someone noticed that ASUS (not exactly a small company) had not |
38 |
> published the full sources for their eee pc OS on their site; they were |
39 |
> notified, and subsequently they added that code. Read the full story: |
40 |
|
41 |
>http://cliffhacks.blogspot.com/2007/11/asus-eeepc-first-impressions-and-gpl.html |
42 |
>http://cliffhacks.blogspot.com/2007/11/asus-eeepc-some-sources-posted.html |
43 |
|
44 |
You are talking about device drivers here, not products that have a hidxden |
45 |
OS and use linux as the RTOS inside the product. Verifying what is acutally |
46 |
inside of a close (RTOS) system is difficult, at best, and often impossible |
47 |
it the firmware engineer wants to make it difficult for other to analyze. |
48 |
|
49 |
There is a group of firmware engineers that have publically stated that |
50 |
they write for free any device driver for any company using EL. To paraphrase |
51 |
that person, <the problem is not finding coders to write device drivers, |
52 |
it's convincing companies to open source their drivers or allow their products |
53 |
to inter-operate with OS drivers> |
54 |
|
55 |
> Other companies have been sued or notified, but not just because they |
56 |
> were big or small, but because they failed to obey the GPL (xterasys, |
57 |
> monsoon, fortinet, d-link...you can find tons of cases just by googling |
58 |
> a bit), someone even admitted their faults, |
59 |
> In some cases, the companies were declared guilty. |
60 |
|
61 |
true, but it does not affect the point I'm trying to make. What you are |
62 |
talking about is a drop of rain, in an ocean. |
63 |
|
64 |
|
65 |
> > Again you miss the point. If some small company builds a product, they |
66 |
> > are not going to want to stray very far from the linux kernel tree. |
67 |
> > The most they do is write a device driver. If they have some real |
68 |
> > 'magic' you just put a second sub $1 micro processor on the circuit |
69 |
> > board and locate your "magic" therein. It's as easy as eating pie. |
70 |
> > Publish your gpl code on the big micro and hide your magic in a small |
71 |
> > proccessor/DSP/FPGA/PAL. There are many other schemes to get around |
72 |
> > GPL, including writing your own boot loader. (not as difficult as it |
73 |
> > sounds). |
74 |
|
75 |
> > What the GPLv3 is doing is effectively keeping the little guys from |
76 |
> > building products ~100% based on linux and open source. They have not |
77 |
> > stopped a single well funded company (or an entire country like China) |
78 |
> > from using linux and open source as they choose. |
79 |
|
80 |
> Why should they have been stopped? |
81 |
|
82 |
|
83 |
I'd just like the charade to end. GPL keeps the serfs on 'massa farm' |
84 |
It does not stop billion dollar entities from doing whatever they want |
85 |
with EL or any other OS (open source) software. |
86 |
|
87 |
|
88 |
> > This is a very huge reason for the current state of affairs for failed |
89 |
> > technology companies (particularly in the USA), at the present time. |
90 |
> > The Linux Journal has a big campaign to locate "linux inside" of |
91 |
> > products, basically asking folks to 'rat out' companies using linux to |
92 |
> > make a buck. <insert your own conspiracy theory here> |
93 |
|
94 |
> Making money, even lots of money, with linux is not prohibited. What is |
95 |
> wrong is when someone does not obey the GPL, and that's what LJ wants to |
96 |
> do: to discover companies that try to benefit from the work of the linux |
97 |
> community without giving anything back (I think you are referring to |
98 |
> the "linux incognito" initiative here). |
99 |
|
100 |
|
101 |
OK, then why does the GPL not make a simple rule change. If you have grossed |
102 |
over 1 million dollars on your linux product or service, then you have to |
103 |
open source your code. |
104 |
|
105 |
That way the little guys can make some money on an idea and a little bit |
106 |
of code before having to publish their work. Beside how much useful code |
107 |
do you think a small entrepreneur really has? The kernel is full of |
108 |
expert coder that are pushing to get their code into the kernel. There is |
109 |
not a shortage of code or coding experts. What the GPL has effectively |
110 |
done is keep the serfs on the farm shoveling manure, IMHO. |
111 |
|
112 |
Remember I espouse this opinion as one who has had financial success, works |
113 |
out of his garage, and picks his next business ventures, as I please. |
114 |
I'm not some unemployed college kid looking for my first job...... |
115 |
|
116 |
|
117 |
|
118 |
> > You still believe gplv3 is a good thing? I think *GPLv3* is the spawn |
119 |
> > of Satan, and that's the reason most of the kernel devs did not go for |
120 |
> > that *horse hockey*! |
121 |
|
122 |
> > > That being said, it would be fantastic if the Gentoo Foundation |
123 |
> > > found ways to make money :) |
124 |
|
125 |
> > It will never happen as longs as "myths" such as the ones you espouse |
126 |
> > reign supreme, IMHO. The reason that Gentoo and all of those souls |
127 |
> > that develop and support it is floundering on near financial failure, |
128 |
> > is the tenants (goals) that others have brain washed onto the masses, |
129 |
> > IMHO. |
130 |
|
131 |
> > The very best way (IMHO) to promote democracy and freedom is for |
132 |
> > the people to have a way to make money as entrepreneurs and small |
133 |
> > business people. Keeping Linux bottled up, via the GPL is just |
134 |
> > plain nuts! Besides that, Linux only bottled up for the little guys, |
135 |
> > HP, IBM, and thousands of other companies used linux every day in |
136 |
> > products or high end services, such as phone/networking gear. |
137 |
> > Who is suing them? |
138 |
|
139 |
> Nobody, because they obey the GPL. |
140 |
|
141 |
*(WRONG)* |
142 |
|
143 |
> > Hell, the US DOD uses Linux like crazy... Who are we kidding with |
144 |
> > the entire GPL schrade? (Keep the serfs where they belong, methinks). |
145 |
|
146 |
|
147 |
>They are just *using* linux. What laws are they breaking? Why should they |
148 |
be sued? |
149 |
|
150 |
|
151 |
Your naive to the point of being astounding. If you think that the Industrial |
152 |
Military Complex has not modified you precious GPL code, then we are all in |
153 |
Deep Doo. You might want to find some old farts that have been around the track |
154 |
a few times and have some private conversations with folks that |
155 |
have experienced technology in a deeper environment that you obviously |
156 |
have not experienced. |
157 |
|
158 |
Beside how do you think the US government is dealing with the 'informational |
159 |
security threat' posed by the internet? Here's one piece of code the |
160 |
US government did publish (and fund) SELINUX. Ever heard of that? |
161 |
Common, use your imagination and connect the dots...... |
162 |
|
163 |
|
164 |
|
165 |
James |
166 |
|
167 |
|
168 |
|
169 |
-- |
170 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |