| 1 |
On Tuesday 23 Aug 2016 08:21:36 Michael Mol wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> If you're not frequently jumping to a non-default boot environment, it's |
| 4 |
> fine. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
That's my problem: I do often want to start a minimal system. As I said |
| 7 |
before not far from here, any time a substantial update is needed, |
| 8 |
especially if it involves more than odd bits of KDE, I first emerge -B, then |
| 9 |
boot into the minimal run level and emerge -K. That way I don't find myself |
| 10 |
having to flip the BRS because of a half-dead desktop at the end of the |
| 11 |
update. Or else I'll do the whole emerge in the minimal run level. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Progress will keep on insisting on being made - hah! Maybe it's time I |
| 14 |
reviewed my whole modus operandi and ditched most of the flexibility I've |
| 15 |
developed over the years. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Rgds |
| 19 |
Peter |
Archives