Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] mobo replaced; eth0 fails
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:04:35
Message-Id: 20111112140312.0c21465e@digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] mobo replaced; eth0 fails by Allan Gottlieb
1 On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 08:44:16 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
2
3 > > Removing it does the same thing. The device file is re-created with
4 > > the currently probed hardware and indexes start from 0. It's just
5 > > that most people prefer to just remove it because it's less typing
6 > > and less prone to errors.
7 >
8 > I was worried that then eth0 might be wireless and eth1 wired,
9 > but I should have tried it and only changed names if the switch
10 > happened.
11
12 No, that was a valid worry, you did the right thing. Removing the file is
13 easiest, but only 100% safe if you have only one eth device.
14
15
16 --
17 Neil Bothwick
18
19 Love and Trust: Oral sex between cannibals.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] mobo replaced; eth0 fails Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu>