| 1 |
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 00:10:41 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Ahh. I was curious and thought about that. That version is mentioned |
| 4 |
> in the error tho so I wasn't sure. I wonder tho, can I add that file |
| 5 |
> and not have a version at all? Sort of like I do in package.keywords |
| 6 |
> etc etc. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
You can, but you just said. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> I've |
| 11 |
> never put anything in the env directory before and would prefer to keep |
| 12 |
> it that way because I will forget it is there and it will come back and |
| 13 |
> bite me some day. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Using the version number means the setting will "expire" when the |
| 16 |
package is upgraded, meaning it won;t be able to bite you later on. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Though I would prefix the atom with ~ instead of = to cover patch level |
| 19 |
updates. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
An infinite number of monkeys pounding away on keyboards will |
| 26 |
eventually produce a report showing that Windows is more secure, |
| 27 |
and has a lower TCO, than linux. |
Archives