| 1 |
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Jul 8, 2013 1:05 AM, "Bruce Hill" <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 12:07:51PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 7 |
>> > On 2013-07-06 8:12 AM, Bruce Hill <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com> |
| 8 |
>> > wrote: |
| 9 |
>> > > NB: I only sell the best A/V software on the market, which hasn't |
| 10 |
>> > > missed a virus in the wild since it's inception. |
| 11 |
>> > |
| 12 |
>> > Not to start a flamewar on which is the best AV, but I'm curious which |
| 13 |
>> > one this is? |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> http://www.eset.com/us/home/whyeset/compare/ |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Oh. My. Goodness! ESET! I *love* that piece of gold :-) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> In fact, I'm still having the glow from the satisfaction of successfully |
| 20 |
> convincing the management to replace the previous p.o.s. that goes by the |
| 21 |
> name of "SEP", with this wonderful antivirus. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> The first week, ESET unearthed more than 1'000 threats (throughout the |
| 24 |
> company) that SEP had turned a blind eye to. It's really a mystery how SEP |
| 25 |
> ever got crowned with any "Good" attributes. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Granted, the "Business" version has much more options than one can shake a |
| 28 |
> stick at, but for control-happy BOFHs, ESET is a godsend, a breath of fresh |
| 29 |
> air compared to the CPU-guzzling ineffective p.o.s. called SEP. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> (sorry for the tangential offtopicness, I'm just so very glad to see a |
| 32 |
> fellow ESET-believer ;-) ). |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Rgds, |
| 35 |
> -- |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I love it as well, I even used their Linux-gateway scanner to scan |
| 38 |
network traffic. I know there are other free ways to do that, but |
| 39 |
ESET had impressed me enough by then. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
Alecks Gates |
Archives