| 1 |
On Jul 8, 2013 1:05 AM, "Bruce Hill" <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 12:07:51PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On 2013-07-06 8:12 AM, Bruce Hill <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com> |
| 6 |
wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > NB: I only sell the best A/V software on the market, which hasn't |
| 8 |
> > > missed a virus in the wild since it's inception. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Not to start a flamewar on which is the best AV, but I'm curious which |
| 11 |
> > one this is? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> http://www.eset.com/us/home/whyeset/compare/ |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Oh. My. Goodness! ESET! I *love* that piece of gold :-) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
In fact, I'm still having the glow from the satisfaction of successfully |
| 18 |
convincing the management to replace the previous p.o.s. that goes by the |
| 19 |
name of "SEP", with this wonderful antivirus. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
The first week, ESET unearthed more than 1'000 threats (throughout the |
| 22 |
company) that SEP had turned a blind eye to. It's really a mystery how SEP |
| 23 |
ever got crowned with any "Good" attributes. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Granted, the "Business" version has much more options than one can shake a |
| 26 |
stick at, but for control-happy BOFHs, ESET is a godsend, a breath of fresh |
| 27 |
air compared to the CPU-guzzling ineffective p.o.s. called SEP. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
(sorry for the tangential offtopicness, I'm just so very glad to see a |
| 30 |
fellow ESET-believer ;-) ). |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Rgds, |
| 33 |
-- |
Archives