1 |
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:25:15 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > That got me thinking. Everywhere that portage operates or owns |
4 |
> > things, should the ownership not be portage.portage |
5 |
> > and what would the typical permissions be? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Here, all of /etc/portage is root:root |
8 |
> The tree and all overlays are portage:portage |
9 |
|
10 |
Just to add some confusion to the mix |
11 |
|
12 |
root@fenchurch: drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3378 Aug 25 08:43 /var/portage |
13 |
root@hactar: drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3378 Aug 25 07:55 /var/portage |
14 |
root@vroomfondel: drwxr-xr-x 168 root root 4096 Aug 25 08:03 /var/portage |
15 |
root@slartibartfast: drwxr-xr-x 1 portage portage 3378 Aug 25 08:05 /var/portage |
16 |
root@lunkwill: drwxr-xr-x 168 portage portage 4096 Aug 25 07:35 /var/portage |
17 |
root@quordlepleen: drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3378 Aug 25 08:04 /var/portage |
18 |
|
19 |
So some are portage:portage, some are root:root - all use /var/portage |
20 |
for $PORTDIR so that's not an issue. One of the portage:portage ones is |
21 |
the one that syncs with the mirrors and acts as an rsync host for the |
22 |
others, this may or may not be significant. |
23 |
|
24 |
Downloading a portage snapshot shows it all to be owned by |
25 |
portage:portage, so I guess that's as close as we are going to get to a |
26 |
definitive answer. |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Neil Bothwick |
31 |
|
32 |
If at first you don't succeed, you'll get a lot of free advice from |
33 |
folks who didn't succeed either. |