| 1 |
On 10/06/2014 16:27, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:35:57 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I know about --keep-going, I don't like it much. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> What's not to like? Do you like a long emerge list aborting as soon as |
| 7 |
> you turn your back because of a missing patch file in a minor package? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Yes, exactly. For two reasons: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
1. In the vast majority of cases, there's something to deal with and I |
| 14 |
like to deal with it now. Missing patch files are comparatively rare for |
| 15 |
me, whereas X doesn't build with the latest version of Y is somewhat |
| 16 |
common. I'd rather mask the new version of Y and let portage re-figure |
| 17 |
things out. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
2. My over-the-top OCDness won't let me leave the bloody thing alone and |
| 20 |
let it finish, if I know there's an error in there I feel compelled to |
| 21 |
hit Ctrl-C and find out what the error is :-) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 27 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives