1 |
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 08:56:54AM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
2 |
> On 10/04/2011 06:16 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > On Oct 4, 2011 5:10 PM, "Neil Bothwick" <neil@××××××××××.uk |
5 |
> > <mailto:neil@××××××××××.uk>> wrote: |
6 |
> >> |
7 |
> >> On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 04:49:56 -0500, Dale wrote: |
8 |
> >> |
9 |
> >> > Subject line says it pretty well. Is grub2 stable, who uses it and can |
10 |
> >> > you post your experience on the switching process? Was it difficult? |
11 |
> >> |
12 |
> >> I use it on my netbook, which I admittedly don't boot more than a couple |
13 |
> >> of times a month. It's stable, I can't comment on the switching process |
14 |
> >> as I used GRUB2 from the start with this machine, it seemed a good time |
15 |
> >> to get to grips with it. |
16 |
> >> |
17 |
> >> GRUB2 is neither complicated nor difficult, but it is different. If you |
18 |
> >> try to think in terms of legacy GRUB, you will have more problems than if |
19 |
> >> you approach is as learning a new system. |
20 |
> >> |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > Kind of tangential... |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > Why does Gentoo still 'standardize' on grub instead of going forward |
25 |
> > with grub2? |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Grub2 is weird (coming from anything that isn't grub2), and if you mess |
28 |
> up the upgrade, you can't boot. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> It's a support nightmare. |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
Wow - what an improvement. :| |
34 |
|
35 |
Terry |