| 1 |
On 10/04/2011 06:16 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Oct 4, 2011 5:10 PM, "Neil Bothwick" <neil@××××××××××.uk |
| 4 |
> <mailto:neil@××××××××××.uk>> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 04:49:56 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> > Subject line says it pretty well. Is grub2 stable, who uses it and can |
| 9 |
>> > you post your experience on the switching process? Was it difficult? |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> I use it on my netbook, which I admittedly don't boot more than a couple |
| 12 |
>> of times a month. It's stable, I can't comment on the switching process |
| 13 |
>> as I used GRUB2 from the start with this machine, it seemed a good time |
| 14 |
>> to get to grips with it. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> GRUB2 is neither complicated nor difficult, but it is different. If you |
| 17 |
>> try to think in terms of legacy GRUB, you will have more problems than if |
| 18 |
>> you approach is as learning a new system. |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Kind of tangential... |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Why does Gentoo still 'standardize' on grub instead of going forward |
| 24 |
> with grub2? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Grub2 is weird (coming from anything that isn't grub2), and if you mess |
| 27 |
up the upgrade, you can't boot. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
It's a support nightmare. |
Archives