| 1 |
On Oct 4, 2011 5:10 PM, "Neil Bothwick" <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 04:49:56 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Subject line says it pretty well. Is grub2 stable, who uses it and can |
| 6 |
> > you post your experience on the switching process? Was it difficult? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I use it on my netbook, which I admittedly don't boot more than a couple |
| 9 |
> of times a month. It's stable, I can't comment on the switching process |
| 10 |
> as I used GRUB2 from the start with this machine, it seemed a good time |
| 11 |
> to get to grips with it. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> GRUB2 is neither complicated nor difficult, but it is different. If you |
| 14 |
> try to think in terms of legacy GRUB, you will have more problems than if |
| 15 |
> you approach is as learning a new system. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Kind of tangential... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Why does Gentoo still 'standardize' on grub instead of going forward with |
| 21 |
grub2? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Rgds, |
Archives