Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Brett I. Holcomb" <brettholcomb@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Stale Samba in Portage
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 01:37:26
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.62.0508012131260.5651@gandalf
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Stale Samba in Portage by "W.Kenworthy"
1 Bill, have you used RPMs <G>. Then you will appreciate portage <G>. When
2 I came to Gentoo from Caldera it was such a relief not to have to use
3 RPMs! It's never faltered on me and the ~arch keeps "unstable" stuff out
4 of my sight unless
5 I chose it.
6
7
8 On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, W.Kenworthy wrote:
9
10 > Its ok for a quick check - especially as I dont want ~x86 samba on that
11 > system.
12 >
13 > I regard /etc/portage and the way it has been done is a disaster waiting
14 > to happen. You have files hidden away in there that unless you make the
15 > effort, can (and do) keep insecure versions of software on your system -
16 > make sure you regularly check what you put in there! It also did not
17 > work properly on two of my systems (one has been decommissioned and the
18 > other has been so much upgraded I think the problem has gone away - I
19 > gave up after hours of trying to track down inconsistencies.
20 >
21 > Sorry, but I hanker back to simpler times when -i made things so easy
22 > and I didnt have to worry about someones idea of an "elegant" fix ...
23 >
24 > BillK
25 >
26 >
27 > On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 19:45 -0400, fire-eyes wrote:
28 >> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 07:14 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
29 >>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS='~x86' emerge samba -s
30 >>
31 >> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS done on the command line is a very poor idea,
32 >> use /etc/portage/package.use instead.
33 >>
34 >> I forget the specifics, but I have seen a system run into serious
35 >> problems and library screwups over that.
36 >>
37 >
38 >
39
40 --
41
42 Brett I. Holcomb
43 brettholcomb@×××××××××××××.net
44 Registered Linux User #188143
45 Remove R777 to email
46 --
47 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list