1 |
Bill, have you used RPMs <G>. Then you will appreciate portage <G>. When |
2 |
I came to Gentoo from Caldera it was such a relief not to have to use |
3 |
RPMs! It's never faltered on me and the ~arch keeps "unstable" stuff out |
4 |
of my sight unless |
5 |
I chose it. |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, W.Kenworthy wrote: |
9 |
|
10 |
> Its ok for a quick check - especially as I dont want ~x86 samba on that |
11 |
> system. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I regard /etc/portage and the way it has been done is a disaster waiting |
14 |
> to happen. You have files hidden away in there that unless you make the |
15 |
> effort, can (and do) keep insecure versions of software on your system - |
16 |
> make sure you regularly check what you put in there! It also did not |
17 |
> work properly on two of my systems (one has been decommissioned and the |
18 |
> other has been so much upgraded I think the problem has gone away - I |
19 |
> gave up after hours of trying to track down inconsistencies. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Sorry, but I hanker back to simpler times when -i made things so easy |
22 |
> and I didnt have to worry about someones idea of an "elegant" fix ... |
23 |
> |
24 |
> BillK |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 19:45 -0400, fire-eyes wrote: |
28 |
>> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 07:14 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote: |
29 |
>>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS='~x86' emerge samba -s |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS done on the command line is a very poor idea, |
32 |
>> use /etc/portage/package.use instead. |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> I forget the specifics, but I have seen a system run into serious |
35 |
>> problems and library screwups over that. |
36 |
>> |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
|
42 |
Brett I. Holcomb |
43 |
brettholcomb@×××××××××××××.net |
44 |
Registered Linux User #188143 |
45 |
Remove R777 to email |
46 |
-- |
47 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |