1 |
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 19:35, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:15:06 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> > Me, I have always put ext2 on /boot. I just don't see much need in |
5 |
>> > anything fancy for something that is used so seldom plus everything is |
6 |
>> > likely stored somewhere else anyway. The kernel should be in the |
7 |
>> > kernel source directory and a emerge of grub would restore everything |
8 |
>> > else except the config. Not much to lose there. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> One of the benefits of GRUB2 is that the information used to create the |
11 |
> config file is in /etc. If /boot is toasted, you can recreate all you |
12 |
> need with |
13 |
> |
14 |
> grub2-install |
15 |
> grub2-mkconfig |
16 |
> cd /usr/src/linux |
17 |
> make install |
18 |
> |
19 |
>> Not to mention that /boot usually has a noauto option, so it's very |
20 |
>> unlikely that a wayward prog can somehow bollix up the filesystem. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Leaving /boot unmounted invites the inevitable error of forgetting to |
23 |
> mount it before installing a new kernel. I prefer to mount it ro, that |
24 |
> way its contents are available, protected from accidental overwriting and |
25 |
> it shouts at you if you forget to remount it before installing a kernel |
26 |
> or updating GRUB. |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
I have a script that does the menuconfig + diff .config + make + |
30 |
install (including kernel copying to /boot, automagically mounting |
31 |
/boot if needed), so I can get away with noauto ;-) |
32 |
|
33 |
Oh, and it also auto-modifies grub.cfg for me :-D |
34 |
|
35 |
Rgds, |
36 |
-- |
37 |
FdS Pandu E Poluan |
38 |
~ IT Optimizer ~ |
39 |
|
40 |
• LOPSA Member #15248 |
41 |
• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com |
42 |
• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan |