| 1 |
>> I might also add, I see no speed improvements in putting portages work |
| 2 |
>> directory on tmpfs. I have tested this a few times and the difference |
| 3 |
>> in compile times is just not there. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Probably because with 16GB everything stays cached anyway. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Would it still be useful to use tmpfs if you wanted to keep drive |
| 8 |
writes down on an SSD? I imagine even tho its cached it would get |
| 9 |
written to disk after a timer expires, so while it doesn't affect |
| 10 |
performance it does reduce the drive life. |
Archives