1 |
burlingk@×××××××××.mil escribió: |
2 |
> |
3 |
>> -----Original Message----- |
4 |
>> From: lunarcrisis@×××××.com [mailto:lunarcrisis@×××××.com] On |
5 |
>> Behalf Of Henk Boom |
6 |
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:08 AM |
7 |
>> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
8 |
>> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> On 16/07/07, Volker Armin Hemmann |
12 |
>> <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>>> because gplv3 removes freedom? |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>> As far as I remember from when I read it, it does not take |
17 |
>> any freedoms which the previous versions did not intend to. |
18 |
>> The purpose of the GPL is to protect the 4 freedoms. This |
19 |
>> instalment just closes loopholes in the previous versions |
20 |
>> which would allow these freedoms to be infringed upon. |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> Henk Boom |
23 |
>> -- |
24 |
>> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> The four freedoms: |
27 |
> Freedom 0: The freedom to run a program for any purpose. |
28 |
> Freedom 1: To study the way a program works, and adapt it to your needs. |
29 |
> Freedom 2: To redistribute copies so that you can help your neighbors. |
30 |
> Freedom 3: Improve the program, and release your improvements to |
31 |
> the public, so that the whole community benefits. |
32 |
> For freedom 1 and 3 to work, the code must be open. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Freedom 1 is just as important as the other three. Freedom one is |
35 |
> almost eliminated in GPLv3. Freedom One is the freedom that was |
36 |
> most whole heartedly expressed in the original manifesto. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Freedom 3 is the one that GPLv3 is making most important now. |
39 |
> It does so to the detriment of the other three. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
I'm not very into licenses and hence my question may seem evident (or |
44 |
even stupid) but still... does not Freedom 3 imply Freedom 1? I mean, |
45 |
how can you improve a program without being able to study it? |
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |