| 1 |
On 10/31/2009 11:07 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 31 October 2009 22:03:04 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> For instance, you might be running 2.6.31-r4 and also have 2.6.31-r3 |
| 4 |
>>> installed. To install nvidia-drivers, you must build it twice - against |
| 5 |
>>> each kernel you want to use it with (nvidia-drivers builds and installs a |
| 6 |
>>> kernel driver into /lib/modules/<kernel version>) |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> It's a bit more obfuscated than that. Maybe nvidia-drivers work |
| 9 |
>> different, but ati-drivers will build against /usr/src/linux but install |
| 10 |
>> the actual modules in /lib/modules/running_kernel. If /usr/src/linux |
| 11 |
>> doesn't point to the running kernel, the modules will be installed in |
| 12 |
>> the wrong place. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> That is just so mind-bogglingly absurdly stupid I doubt if ATI should even be |
| 16 |
> allowed near a computer.... |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Compiling code never depends on something running, it only depends on things |
| 19 |
> being present that can be linked against. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Thanks for reminding me why I insist on NVidia GPUs, I'd forgotten. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
This isn't ATI's installer. It's the ebuild that does this. |
Archives