| 1 |
On Sun, 23 May 2010 18:16:53 +0300 |
| 2 |
Arttu V. wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 5/23/10, David Relson <relson@×××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Hi Arttu, |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > The portage tree is fine, AFAICT. emerge finds the ebuild, but |
| 8 |
> > the emerge fails. Removing "--jobs 4" doesn't change the result. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Ok, then that could be discarded as just some wild speculation. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Next idea, how about just marking a single arch: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64 x86" |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Wonder how that got there? I must have been in a creative mood |
| 17 |
when I did that. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The extra arch has been removed, but didn't help matters ... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> I don't know if the java ebuilds, eclasses and wrapper-scripts are |
| 22 |
> wise enough to figure out the correct dependencies with such keywords. |
| 23 |
> I could imagine some part might figure out the arch as x86, but then |
| 24 |
> your system vm would be set to the x86_64 vm, i.e., no x86 system vm |
| 25 |
> set ... (again, just some more wild speculation ;) ) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Have started "emerge -auNDtqv world". Emerge has found a bunch of |
| 28 |
packages to downgrade, including several java related ones. I'll |
| 29 |
report back later (after a family picnic this afternoon). |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Regards, |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
David |
Archives