| 1 |
Michael Hennebry wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>>>>> Oh, and BTW, on gentoo your optimization choices for gcc are -O, -O2 |
| 4 |
>>>>> or nothing, because all other -O options are replaced with -O2 by |
| 5 |
>>>>> toolchain.eclass. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Perhaps I misunderstood the preceeding. |
| 8 |
> I'd taken it to mean that recompiling any package with gentoo tools |
| 9 |
> would result in -Os being replaced by -O2 . |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
AFAI understood the preceeding Richard wrote: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
"on gentoo your optimization choices for gcc are ... " |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I interpret this as: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
emerge gcc with CFLAGS containing -Os |
| 18 |
get gcc compiled with -O2 |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Not "any package", gcc (due to toolchain.eclass ...). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
My way of seeing this, corrections welcome. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
>> Being the OP in this case, I want to state that I didn't want "-Os for |
| 25 |
>> all pkgs". I just decided to set "-Os" inside my CFLAGS, and I am |
| 26 |
>> perfectly happy with any working gcc resulting from this. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> A statement quoted above suggested to me that |
| 29 |
> you were unlikely to get -Os for anything. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Earlier in this thread I went -O3, then -O2, now -Os ... |
| 32 |
As I stated several times, I learn. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Greets, Stefan. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives