Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] --depclean wants to remove much of java. Is this safe?
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:28:24
Message-Id: 20110911062635.GA3066@ca.inter.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] --depclean wants to remove much of java. Is this safe? by Allan Gottlieb
1 110910 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
2 > I converted two machines from icedtea (java6) to oracle-jdk-bin (java7).
3 > I did in effect
4 > emerge --depclean icedtea icedtea-web =virtual/jdk-1.6.0 =virtual/jdk-1.6.0
5 > On one machine portage now claims that I basically don't need java
6 > (see the output of --depclean below). Can this be right?
7 >
8 > dev-java/ant-nodeps
9 > selected: 1.8.1
10 > protected: none
11 > omitted: none
12
13 *** remainder snipped ***
14
15 I recently removed Java from my system: all I seem to have lost
16 is direct access to the help files in LibreOffice,
17 which have a fully adequate PDF substitute.
18
19 You can check each package in your list with 'emerge -cpv <pkg>'
20 & see what it says requires it: if they only support one another,
21 you can fairly safely remove them all.
22
23 --
24 ========================,,============================================
25 SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb
26 ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto
27 TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] --depclean wants to remove much of java. Is this safe? Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu>
Re: [gentoo-user] --depclean wants to remove much of java. Is this safe? Jonathan <winelauncher.jonathan@××××××××××.com>