1 |
On 2010-11-15, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 17:31 on Monday 15 November 2010, Grant |
3 |
> Edwards did opine thusly: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On 2010-11-14, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>> > Finally, if xorg-server-1.8 is around the corner to be stabilised I |
7 |
>> > suggest that you unmask it and use the xorg.conf file that we all |
8 |
>> > know and love. :-) |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Using xorg.conf with 1.7 is simple enough (it's what I do on all my |
11 |
>> other machines). That's why I don't understand why the Gentoo |
12 |
>> developers decided to use HAL by default when it seems to be widely |
13 |
>> acknowledged to be such a disaster. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> The Gentoo devs made no such decision. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Upstream did. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Gentoo closely tracks upstream, unless upstream is completely broken. |
20 |
> HAL might be a crock of chit, but it does not render X broken and not |
21 |
> usable. |
22 |
|
23 |
Whether Xorg uses HAL or not is controlled by a USE flag isn't it? So |
24 |
upstream choses the defaults for USE flags? |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! My BIOLOGICAL ALARM |
28 |
at CLOCK just went off ... It |
29 |
gmail.com has noiseless DOZE FUNCTION |
30 |
and full kitchen!! |