1 |
On 25/09/18 05:49, Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:34 PM Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> On 24/09/2018 13:11, R0b0t1 wrote: |
5 |
>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>>> To me it looks like youtubers and some sites trying to make money through |
8 |
>>>> clickbait? |
9 |
>>>> |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> If you had not heard of it elsewhere the Linux code of conduct was |
12 |
>>> amended. It makes the CoC similar to those of other projects where |
13 |
>>> there are a number of (usually nontechnical) contributors who identify |
14 |
>>> as a champion of social justice. |
15 |
>>> [...] |
16 |
>> Well, if kernel developers are fine with that, then I don't see how |
17 |
>> that's relevant to anyone who isn't a kernel dev. If they want to adopt |
18 |
>> social justice politics, that's really their prerogative. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
If you read LWN, actually a lot of kernel devs aren't fine with it - |
21 |
they didn't have any say, and don't like it. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Actually, social justice politics didn't seem to have anything to do |
24 |
> with the CoC |
25 |
> adoption. It was more of Linus taking a backseat (due to how he self-assessed |
26 |
> his vacation behavior) and pretty soon after, they adopted CoC, most likely as |
27 |
> some kind of "standardization" |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Barely a week has passed since the CoC though, and already there are political |
30 |
> manuevers to oust high-profile kernel devs |
31 |
|
32 |
How are they going to achieve that? As has been pointed out, if Linus |
33 |
continues to trust them, and treat them as lieutenants, there's nothing |
34 |
the SJWs can do. There's also been comments that - actually - one person |
35 |
in particular who's been a bit of an SJW is actually in breach of the |
36 |
CoC herself, so those manoeuvres could backfire spectacularly. |
37 |
|
38 |
> to the point that some contributors |
39 |
> have started talks on exercising their copyright privileges and |
40 |
> withholding their |
41 |
> code. Which they have a right to do, by the way, if they feel the foundation |
42 |
> has betrayed them. |
43 |
|
44 |
Withholding their code FROM WHOM? |
45 |
> |
46 |
> So as esr has put it: |
47 |
>> First, let me confirm that this threat has teeth. I researched the relevant law |
48 |
>> when I was founding the Open Source Initiative. In the U.S. there is case law |
49 |
>> confirming that reputational losses relating to conversion of the rights of a |
50 |
>> contributor to a GPLed project are judicable in law. I do not know the case law |
51 |
>> outside the U.S., but in countries observing the Berne Convention without the |
52 |
>> U.S.’s opt-out of the “moral rights” clause, that clause probably gives the |
53 |
>> objectors an even stronger case. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> (http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8139) |
56 |
> |
57 |
> This is not a little online trollfest that only affects kernel devs. |
58 |
> This can affect |
59 |
> literally everything. Biblical proportions, dogs and cats living together, etc. |
60 |
> |
61 |
As we know from the SCOG case, pretty much everything is judicable in |
62 |
American law, even when they have absolutely no case. Are you telling me |
63 |
that I can withdraw YOUR right to use my code, just because I dislike |
64 |
what some random 3rd party with no relationship to either of us has |
65 |
done? Surely that pretty blatantly falls foul of estoppel. Although of |
66 |
course that didn't stop SCOG ... Where's PJ when you need her ... |
67 |
|
68 |
As for "moral rights", I don't think that actually grants any extra |
69 |
rights or anything. It mostly says that if I am the author of something, |
70 |
I can NOT sign away my right to be credited as such. You can buy the |
71 |
copyright off me, at which point I have no rights to benefit further |
72 |
from the work, but you cannot buy the right to be credited as the author |
73 |
- that is not for sale under "moral rights" law. |
74 |
|
75 |
(Oh - and the linux trademark is apparently Linus' personal property, so |
76 |
that throws another hand grenade onto the table ... :-) |
77 |
|
78 |
Cheers, |
79 |
Wol |