1 |
On Thursday, May 7, 2020 7:31 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Rich Freeman wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> OP, odds are the emerge failure is what triggered the problem. If it had |
6 |
> completed without failure, it would likely have been a clean update. This is |
7 |
> why I set up a chroot and do my updates there and use the -k option to |
8 |
> install on my actual system. It takes very little time and so far, no |
9 |
> breakages on my real system. If any thing fails, it's more likely to be in |
10 |
> the chroot which won't hurt anything. If you able, may be a option worth |
11 |
> thinking about for yourself as well. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Dale |
14 |
> |
15 |
> :-) :-) |
16 |
|
17 |
ya. i said it already. emerge's update failed |
18 |
with some package midways (some package needed |
19 |
some USE flag change), but then layman stopped |
20 |
working in this incomplete state. |
21 |
|
22 |
also the issue was simple. but i pointed out that |
23 |
the inconvenience of having a fancy dependency on |
24 |
a pms is still there. |