From: | James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ??? | ||
Date: | Mon, 18 Apr 2016 22:34:55 | ||
Message-Id: | loom.20160419T003112-417@post.gmane.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ??? by Corbin |
1 | Corbin <corbinbird <at> charter.net> writes: |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | > Understanding should not hinge on other peoples convenience. |
5 | |
6 | If you look at the Subject and then read the (naked) post, |
7 | it does make sense. This thread is much ado about nothing, imho. |
8 | |
9 | Mobile posters, often cut more than one would at a workstation, |
10 | or top post. Not ideal, but not a big deal either. Gmane.org forces me |
11 | to have responses larger than the quoted material, so there is |
12 | a wide spectrum of semantics related to postings and follow ups. |
13 | |
14 | |
15 | hth, |
16 | James |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ??? | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ??? | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ??? | "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org> |