Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Separate /usr | ||
| Date: | Thu, 10 May 2007 09:47:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070510104016.360d3a97@hactar.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: Separate /usr by Alexander Skwar |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:41:04 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > > It is faster. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Hm. I don't understand. Why is portage in a sparse file of, let's say, |
| 6 | > 400m, with reiserfs and notail mounted, faster, then a real partition |
| 7 | > of 400m with reiserfs and notail? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | No idea, but I tried it when I encountered that page and portage |
| 10 | operations were measurably faster. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Neil Bothwick |
| 15 | |
| 16 | If you got the words it does not mean you got the knowledge. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Separate /usr | Benno Schulenberg <benno.schulenberg@×××××.com> |