Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout2/openrc question
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:08:51
Message-Id: 4B69BB65.5040902@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout2/openrc question by Neil Bothwick
1 Neil Bothwick wrote:
2 > On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:09:08 -0600, Dale wrote:
3 >
4 >
5 >> In my opinion, the old portage was good, the new one is even better.
6 >> Now if the next version will prevent a person from borking their
7 >> system, that would be heaven. lol You know, unmerge python and see
8 >> what happens. Yes, you can still unmerge python, even the only version
9 >> you have left, and portage not say a darn thing. It kills the heck out
10 >> of portage tho.
11 >>
12 >
13 > Portage gives you a big red warning if you try to do this, but it
14 > doesn't, and shouldn't, try to stop you. What if you really want to
15 > remove Python? Postage is not the only package manager, so python is not
16 > compulsory.
17 >
18 >
19
20 It doesn't here. Someone else did the same thing a few weeks ago with
21 no warning or didn't mention seeing one at least. I've read where
22 others have done this too.
23
24 It just seems to me that portage should keep it so it can work. It
25 needs python to do that. Since portage is the package manager for
26 Gentoo, portage is the one that should be protected.
27
28 Dale
29
30 :-) :-)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout2/openrc question Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout2/openrc question Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>