1 |
On 2016-06-02(04:37:00+0000), James wrote: |
2 |
> ng0 <ng0 <at> n0.is> writes: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > > Is there a consistent semantic to at least list all of the portage tree |
5 |
> > > packages there are listed on as maintainer? |
6 |
> > > Is there a universal, slick way to list the overlay packages they are |
7 |
> > > working on (github)? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> > What about checking out the portage repo and doing the native git search |
10 |
> > in there via log? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I was actually hoping for something much simpler and always as current as the |
13 |
> last sync of protage and the corresponding overlays (layman syntax). Perhaps |
14 |
> an option I missed in the 'q' applets (portage-utils) or gentoolkit ? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> If nothing exist, I'd consider writing some C (q applets) or python |
18 |
> (gentoolkit) code to perform this searching task. It wont be comprehensive, |
19 |
> but it should work on both the protage tree and the official overlays. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Thoughts and ideas are welcome. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> James |
26 |
|
27 |
I'm not sure if it works like this. |
28 |
You have the metadata.xml files and Changelog files, as far as I know those |
29 |
are the only name -> package relations you can get when not using git. |
30 |
|
31 |
I might be wrong, so a tool like this could be useful if one needs it. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
♥Ⓐ ng0 |
35 |
4096R/13212A27975AF07677A29F7002A296150C201823 |