| 1 |
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:37 +0000 |
| 2 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:33:24 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > > I might be a little bit on the radical side, but with seeing the |
| 7 |
> > > whole KDEPIM debacle I migrated to GNOME 3 and Evolution. It took |
| 8 |
> > > me some time to get used to it but I like it. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> > No, I wouldn't say that's radical. I would say that is common sense. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > A core piece of KDE didn't work for you, and you need that core |
| 13 |
> > piece to work right. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I wouldn't call KDEPIM a core piece of KDE. If it were core, it |
| 16 |
> probably wouldn't have been allowed to get into the state it is in. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Let me elaborate. Not so much a core piece of KDE itself so that |
| 20 |
everything else needs it to work, more a core piece in that the average |
| 21 |
user feels the DE is severely neutered without it. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Alan McKinnnon |
| 25 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives