1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 12 March 2009 10:07:03 Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Could he just not sync and call it a day? I suspect this is going to |
6 |
>> bite him one day tho. We know Gentoo likes to be updated fairly |
7 |
>> regular. I been around Gentoo for years and I don't think I would want |
8 |
>> to do this. I'm not sure how much experience the OP has tho. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Michael's been around a while, his name is familiar. He did say he wants -rN |
12 |
> updates so I take that to mean he wants bug fixes and security updates but |
13 |
> everything else to stay that same and especially no potential ABI/API changes |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Not an unreasonable thing actually - it's what you get with RedHat or any |
16 |
> decent enterprise distro |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
>> I do understand that getting something stable and working then wanting |
20 |
>> to keep it that way. I'm just wondering what his mileage may be in the |
21 |
>> long run. |
22 |
>> |
23 |
> |
24 |
> I can only imagine what will happen if he forgets that package.mask and then |
25 |
> removes it six months later:-) |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
Since he has been around a while and knows what he wants, then I guess |
30 |
he knows the possible pitfalls too. I just wanted to mention it in case |
31 |
he doesn't know that not updating can lead to issues later on. Didn't I |
32 |
post on a thread recently about a system not being updated in a long |
33 |
while and a reinstall was better than updating? It's one of those |
34 |
things that worries me. |
35 |
|
36 |
I must confess that I do the same with my kernel. When I get one that |
37 |
works, I just don't want to update. I download them and build a new one |
38 |
but just don't boot them. Of course this is another reason why too: |
39 |
|
40 |
root@smoker / # uptime |
41 |
03:23:09 up 60 days, 11:10, 3 users, load average: 1.16, 1.33, 1.37 |
42 |
root@smoker / # |
43 |
|
44 |
I go for a while without rebooting and forget the new kernel is there. |
45 |
|
46 |
Yea, if something happens to the package.mask file, he's in for a |
47 |
surprise for sure. |
48 |
|
49 |
OP, you may also want to make package.mask a directory and then you can |
50 |
sort out your files easier too. Just something to think about. I think |
51 |
that is a new feature. |
52 |
|
53 |
Dale |
54 |
|
55 |
:-) :-) |