1 |
On 7/2/06, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On 7/2/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@××××.dk> wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sunday 02 July 2006 18:14, Mark Knecht wrote: |
4 |
> > > I have mythtv-0.18.1-r1 installed. Now it appears that it's not |
5 |
> > > even an option anymore? What happened to Myth? |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > I do not want to update to 0.19 as it means work on 5 machines that |
8 |
> > > I don't want to undertake. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > You can grab the ebuild and it's patches from cvs [1] and place them in an |
11 |
> > overlay. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/media-tv/mythtv/ |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > -- |
16 |
> > Bo Andresen |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Bo, |
19 |
> Thanks for the pointer. I suppose I'll have to do this. Bummer.... |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Why was 0.18 removed from portage? Has there been a thread on that |
22 |
> subject I missed as I'm not reading this list very carefully right |
23 |
> now. 0.18 was in portage for over a year I think. Why not mark it |
24 |
> stable or leave it in the group of masked ebuilds and let us make a |
25 |
> choice? |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I thought Gentoo was about choice. Who ever is maintaining this has |
28 |
> taken choice away from me and replaced it with more work. Bummer. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Cheers, |
31 |
> Mark |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
It is disappointing to find out that MYthTV-0.18-x was removed for |
35 |
reasons that some folks feel were possibly invalid. Apparently (IF I |
36 |
UNDERSTAND THIS - I probably don't...) there was a security bug found |
37 |
in ffmpeg and (I don't know why) a decision was taken to remove |
38 |
revisions of applications that used ffmpeg. However on my machine |
39 |
attempting emerge -pve mythtv-0.18-X doesn't indicate that it would |
40 |
have emerged ffmpeg, so what is the problem? Why remove this version? |
41 |
|
42 |
Maybe someone here knows the history? I couldn't get it from the bugs |
43 |
I looked at. If MythTV doesn't use ffmpeg then is the issue that they |
44 |
copied some bad code instead of linking in the bad library? |
45 |
|
46 |
Again, it seems to make little sense to me. |
47 |
|
48 |
- Mark |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |