| 1 |
On 2013-08-05 10:10 AM, Anthony G. Basile <basile@××××××××××××××.edu> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/05/2013 06:19 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> That might be the systemd upstream view point, but definately isn't mine. |
| 4 |
>> Fact is that udev can be built and ran standalone without systemd and |
| 5 |
>> you don't need eudev for that. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> For now. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
And this is ultimately my primary concern. After reading the huge |
| 10 |
threads surrounding this debacle, I wouldn't trust Lennart (or the other |
| 11 |
systemd devs) on any promise to not remove this ability at a later date. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> And you get a ton of bloat. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
And this is the second concern. Both of these are why I decided to go |
| 16 |
with eudev. I looked at mdev, but it looked a lot more complicated to |
| 17 |
get right than eudev (correct me if I'm wrong someone). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Thanks again Anthony for your work maintaining eudev for 'the rest of |
| 20 |
us'... :) |
Archives