| 1 |
On Friday 15 Jan 2016 03:02:07 Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 15/01/16 10:15, Peter Weilbacher wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> I thought these are only security fixes? Version 20 is actully |
| 6 |
> >>> feature-complete and in-par with the Windows version 20. |
| 7 |
> >>> |
| 8 |
> >>> v11.2.202.559 might be from December, but it's based on an ancient |
| 9 |
> >>> version |
| 10 |
> >>> from many years ago feature-wise. |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> That may well be the case. But who cares about features in a tool that's |
| 13 |
> >> basically dead and only installed on 99.9% of the machines because some |
| 14 |
> >> stupid websites[1] need it? |
| 15 |
> >> |
| 16 |
> >> Peter. |
| 17 |
> >> |
| 18 |
> >> [1] That work with the feature set of v11.2 -- at least I haven't heard |
| 19 |
> >> otherwise. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > You haven't visited enough porn sites then :-P |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Well, so far that weather radar site is the only one that I have found |
| 24 |
> that needs flash. If they would switch it to HTML5, flash could be |
| 25 |
> gone. I wouldn't complain about that. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Dale |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> :-) :-) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
In the UK websites like Channel 5 will not play on Linux any more: |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
http://www.channel5.com/demand5 |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
They said that they will not support the platform (too small a percentage of |
| 36 |
users) although I am not sure how android based smart TVs can stream this |
| 37 |
channel. |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Regards, |
| 40 |
Mick |
Archives