| 1 |
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 15/01/16 10:15, Peter Weilbacher wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>> I thought these are only security fixes? Version 20 is actully |
| 6 |
>>> feature-complete and in-par with the Windows version 20. |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> v11.2.202.559 might be from December, but it's based on an ancient |
| 9 |
>>> version |
| 10 |
>>> from many years ago feature-wise. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> That may well be the case. But who cares about features in a tool that's |
| 13 |
>> basically dead and only installed on 99.9% of the machines because some |
| 14 |
>> stupid websites[1] need it? |
| 15 |
>> Peter. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> [1] That work with the feature set of v11.2 -- at least I haven't heard |
| 18 |
>> otherwise. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> You haven't visited enough porn sites then :-P |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Well, so far that weather radar site is the only one that I have found |
| 27 |
that needs flash. If they would switch it to HTML5, flash could be |
| 28 |
gone. I wouldn't complain about that. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Dale |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
:-) :-) |
Archives