Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Adobe flash warning and tree
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:48:48
Message-Id: n7abop$su0$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Adobe flash warning and tree by Peter Weilbacher
1 On 15/01/16 10:15, Peter Weilbacher wrote:
2 > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
3 >
4 >> I thought these are only security fixes? Version 20 is actully
5 >> feature-complete and in-par with the Windows version 20.
6 >>
7 >> v11.2.202.559 might be from December, but it's based on an ancient version
8 >> from many years ago feature-wise.
9 >
10 > That may well be the case. But who cares about features in a tool that's
11 > basically dead and only installed on 99.9% of the machines because some
12 > stupid websites[1] need it?
13 > Peter.
14 >
15 > [1] That work with the feature set of v11.2 -- at least I haven't heard
16 > otherwise.
17
18 You haven't visited enough porn sites then :-P

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Adobe flash warning and tree Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>