| 1 |
On Dec 12, 2011 6:00 AM, "Neil Bothwick" <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:48:11 +0000, James Broadhead wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > > Parallel doesn't work correctly, and it shouldn't be enabled unless |
| 6 |
> > > you're looking for fun ways to break stuff. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > It's worked for me ever since I switched all of my machines to OpenRC |
| 9 |
> > a year+(?) ago. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> You are not a representative sample. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
worksforme |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
In production servers, even. Virtualized on top of XenServer. All of them |
| 17 |
last updated last week. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> > "We broke it, so let's just remove the comments about it" _is_ a |
| 20 |
> > cynical response. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Maybe, but those are your words. How about "it is known to be buggy and |
| 23 |
> no one has the time or inclination to maintain it..." |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> The fact that such a glaring bug slipped through on the 0.9.6 release |
| 26 |
> indicates that this is likely to be the case. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Too bad. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I much prefer OpenRC to systemd our upstart. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Rgds, |
Archives