| 1 |
Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:39:51 -0600, Dale wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >> Mike posted a bug number. I guess it doesn't hit everyone but it did |
| 6 |
> >> me. Is anyone that knows me surprised that this bug hit me? :-) |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > If affected my laptop but not my desktop. Re-emerging qt-core with |
| 9 |
> > -Os in CFLAGS instead of -O2 "fixes" it. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I think I am going to go back to KDE 4.9 for now. They are working on |
| 14 |
> it. It appears that gcc is the real problem tho. So, I may just |
| 15 |
> upgrade it and see what it breaks. lol Come to think of it, I may |
| 16 |
> already have a newer one installed. Its been a while since I switched |
| 17 |
> gcc versions. Hmmm, going to test this. ;-) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Dale |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> :-) :-) |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood |
| 25 |
> or how you interpreted my words! |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Well, switched to a newer gcc, same thing. Going back to KDE 4.9 for a |
| 29 |
bit. They will have it fixed in a couple days. After all, Linux has |
| 30 |
some of the smartest programmers there is. I'm not sure of some users |
| 31 |
tho, myself included. ;-) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
There was a update to the bug. They seem to have moved away from it |
| 34 |
being gcc. Anyway, they working on it. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Thanks ALL. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Dale |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
:-) :-) |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives